Actually, its CEO messaged me in forums that he considered NextDns's AI threat detection useless and just a bluff. I did use their ControlD dns service,which is not so great and lags behind others like NextDns.
#Mullvad network traffic might be leaking plus
Plus they don't have a 24/7 chat service. Windscribe VPN has lower speeds here in India. And devs are required to make just few changes for HTTP connections to work.
#Mullvad network traffic might be leaking android
Eventhough, I have read that in Android 9 or 10, Google has implemented https by default, but that surely doesn't mean it actually enforces it. And yes although its visible if the connection isn't secure in a browser, but it isn't visible at all in case of other apps. Actually I am aware that my ISP uses Deep Packet inspection. Whether its dns firewall or VPN.Ĭlick to expand.Exactly. The blocking always happens at dns level,if I am not wrong. And cleanweb and kill switch are 2 different features here. So I think private lists cannot be disclosed about. I had seen the same case even in CleanBrowsing dns which also uses private lists and lists from their partners. But they said they use private lists which they won't be able to disclose about. About the blocklists it uses, I had tried to ask which ones they use exactly. Even in most reliable website reviews Surfshark consistently ranks in the top 3 choices in most cases. So that's why I have stuck with Surfshark. Eventhough its this stable now, its still adding technologies to make it even more stable and have more features. Also over the time the suggestions that I gave were implemented, although it did take time. At first when I started using it,there were number of issues regarding speed, uptime, apps not working etc. It's one account subscription covers unlimited devices. It looks like there is a way to send DNS queries to root servers through Mullvad’s WireGuard tunnel.Click to expand.Actually I chose Surfshark for a reason that was cost effective for me. It just feels quite overkill to have OpenVPN and Wireguard running on the box. Is there any way for me to do this without leaking my IP? So far the only solution I have found is to run OpenVPN in parallel and then send my queries over the OpenVPN interface. I would much prefer to run Unbound in "normal" mode, and act as my own DNS server.
The one you listed is I guess the non HTTPS version, they now have DNS over HTTPS at (194.242.2.2), so I am using that now. I am currently doing exactly as you said, putting Unbound in forwarding mode and forwarding to the Mullvad servers. ( Ports 1400 UDP and 1401 TCP do not have DNS hijacking enabled, which might work better for pfSense said in Unbound DNS Resolver through Wireguard Tunnel (Mullvad you for confirming this. * Which ports should I open in my firewall for OpenVPN ? If you want to send DNS queries to root servers through Mullvad then your only choice is OpenVPN and ports 1400, 1401 The only way to use Unbound with Mullvad's WireGuard is to use Unbound in forwarding mode and send queries to their public DNS server (193.138.218.74) or to DNS server available only through their WireGuard tunnel (10.64.0.1) Some time ago I asked their support and they confirmed that they hijack DNS request over WireGuard tunnel. It's impossible to send DNS queries to root servers through Mullvad's WireGuard tunnel. The problem is not on my devices, the problem is that the router cannot make requests to the authoritative servers over the wireguard tunnel. Said in Unbound DNS Resolver through Wireguard Tunnel (Mullvad VPN):
0 kommentar(er)
